Jurisnova

Géopolitique Jurisnova Géopolitique · 01 août 2026 11:15

China denies US accusation of forced labour in Xinjiang

China denies US accusation of forced labour in Xinjiang

Sign up now: Get insights on Asia's fast-moving developments

US President Donald Trump has ordered a ban on ‌imports from 43 more Chinese companies over alleged human rights abuses.

US President Donald Trump has ordered a ban on ‌imports from 43 more Chinese companies over alleged human rights abuses.

PHOTO: AFP

Published Aug 01, 2026, 11:15 AM

Updated Aug 01, 2026, 03:10 PM

Set as preferred sourceListen

BEIJING – China’s Ministry of Commerce said on Aug 1 that the addition of Chinese companies to a list of entities that the US alleges use forced labour has no factual basis, saying the US actions disrupt the stability of global supply chains.

The United States has used its domestic laws to impose unilateral sanctions on Chinese companies, a clear act of economic coercion that has harmed the companies’ legitimate rights, the ministry said in a statement.

It said China opposes forced labour, and that the Xinjiang region – where the US says the alleged human rights abuses took place – is stable, prosperous and free of any “forced labour”.

In the statement, China urged the US to stop “attacking and smearing” Xinjiang over this issue and to end unfair pressure on Chinese companies, warning that Beijing will act to protect the companies’ rights.

The US on July 31 banned ‌imports from 43 more Chinese companies over alleged human rights abuses of Uighur and other minority groups.

The companies were added to the Uighur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List, which restricts the import of goods ​tied to what the US says are human rights abuses and ongoing genocide in the Xinjiang region. REUTERS

More on this topicChina opposes US ‘forced labour’ tariffs, calls for them to be scrappedChina’s new ethnic unity law legalising cultural ‘erasure’, minorities warn at UNSee more on

Xinjiang

Tariffs

Donald Trump

Labour issues

Embargoes and economic sanctions

Source citée

Jurisnova Géopolitique — ouvrir l’original

Contenu repris et affiché sur Jurisnova à des fins d’information ; la source reste Jurisnova Géopolitique.

Se connecter pour réagir 0 republication(s)

Commentaires (0)

Aucun commentaire encore — en tant que juriste, quelle est votre lecture de cette actualité ?

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Soyez le premier à commenter cette actualité.